Safety Ratings Information

Rescue sheet	Available ZH:
Automatic Door Locking
Retracting door handles
Door opening forces
Seatbelt buckle unlatching

• Pass
• Fail
• Not Applicable

1. After MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS model were conducted 4 TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the front passenger's neck protection is rated as "Marginal" and the driver and other passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts. However, there was insufficient protection in the passenger's front airbag, therefore the score for this item is deducted.
   (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full score.
   (4)Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
   (5)This vehicle model has rescue sheet in Chinese version for rescue personnel's reference during emergency operations. In addition, after the impact test, the doors can be opened manually, and the seatbelts can be released normally.
2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Good" protection for the occupant's neck.
3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat was rated "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City gets full score.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-SIZE
Restraint for 10 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-SIZE

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed

1. After MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
   (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full score.
   
2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the capability to install i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it can also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. The front passenger seat is equipped with an automatic airbag deactivation switch, the system can stably operate and effectively provide the airbag status through visualization for the driver and the front passenger.

1. After MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's A-pillar and part of the fender area, the head protection performance is rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood is rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of the vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, which is rated as "Poor" protection. For the leg impact test, the vehicle's front bumper has "Good" protection for the leg of pedestrian and gets full score.
   
2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 9 test results are as below.
   (1)Car-to- Pedestrian Farside Adult (50%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (2)Car-to-Pedestrian Nearside Adult (25%) tests collisions occurred between 55km/h to 60km/h for day scenario and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries, and collisions occurred at 60km/h for night scenario and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (3)Car-to-Pedestrian Nearside Adult (75%) tests (including night), the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (4)Car-to-Pedestrian Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 55km/h to 60km/h and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (5)Car-to-Pedestrian Longitudinal Adult (50%) tests (including night), the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (6)Car-to-Pedestrian Longitudinal Adult (25%) tests (including night), the FCW system meets the warning requirements between 50km/h to 80km/h.
   (7)Car-to-Bicyclist Nearside Adult (50%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (8)Car-to-Bicyclist Longitudinal Adult (50%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 25km/h to 60km/h.
   (9)Car-to-Bicyclist Longitudinal Adult (25%) tests, the system meets the warning requirements between 50km/h to 80km/h.

• Not Applicable

1. MERCEDES-BENZ GLC-CLASS has a standard-fit speed assistance system but cannot recognize the traffic signs for time, distance and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the manual speed limit, the system can effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning and can stably maintain the actual vehicle speed within 5km/h of the manual speed limit.
2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alert driver through audiovisual warning. However, the rear seats are not equipped with occupant detection system, the points for this item are deducted. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with a driver state monitoring system as standard and complies with the relevant requirements.
3. The vehicle is equipped with a standard-fit lane support system. In the overtaking scenario of emergency lane keeping, 1 test scenario (with both VUT and GVT travelling at 72 km/h and a lateral speed of 0.7 m/s) failed to effectively avoid a collision. Besides, in the road edge scenario of lane keeping assist, the system cannot automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path, therefore the points for this item are deducted. Furthermore, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol.
4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the points for this item are deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred only at 80km/h on the right front (-75% overlap) of the vehicle. However, the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW and AEB tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions.
   (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW and AEB tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions.
5. The vehicle is equipped as standard-fit with a blind spot assist system, including blind spot detection function. When a motorcycle enters the blind spot area, the system effectively provides visual warning. Therefore, the blind spot assist system gets full score.