Safety Ratings Information

1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows: 
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver has "Good" protection in all body parts. The rear seat passengers' chest underwent significant compression due to excessive seat belt tension, resulting in "poor" protection. Other important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
   (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4)Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat has "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck. Due to the insufficient effective height of the rear headrest and the large gap between the dummy's head and the headrest, a rear-end collision is likely to cause a whiplash effect on the occupant's neck, therefore, it is rated as "Poor" protection and no points were awarded for rear seat whiplash test.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. However, whiplash performance of front seat does not reach "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system was not awarded the points.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size FIT

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the neck and chest of the 6-year-old child dummy was rated as "Marginal" protection, and other important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. However, 10-year-old dummy was not effectively restrained as it moved forward and the seatbelt strap slipped from its shoulder to upper arm, therefore the score was deducted.
   (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. 

• Not Applicable

1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's A-pillar and the lower edge of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, therefore it was rated as "Marginal" or "Poor" protection.


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (3)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (4)Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 40km/h to 50km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury at 55km/h.

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

• Not Applicable

1. HONDA HR-V is not equipped with a speed assist system. Therefore, no point was awarded for this function.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 60 km/h to 80 km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50 km/h to 80 km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30 km/h to 70 km/h.
   (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 12m headway with decelerations of 6m/s² and 40m headway with deceleration of 2m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. For AEB test scenario, collision occurred at 12m headway with deceleration of 6m/s² and 40m headway with deceleration of 2m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.