Report

Adult Occupant

81%

Child Occupant

69%

Pedestrian

79%

Safety Assist

68%

Specifications

Tested Model HONDA HR-V
Body Type SUV
Year Of Publication 2025
Kerb Weight 1270 kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies Reference Rating Validity

Safety Equipment

Driver 1st row
passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Belt Pretensioner
Belt Loadlimiter
Knee Airbag
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Side Chest Airbag
Side Pelvis Airbag
CHILD PROTECTION
ISOFIX
Integrated Child Seat
Airbag cut-off switch
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Blind Spot Monitoring

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Item Model Name Body Type Engine Drivetrain Rating Applies
1 S(受驗車款) SUV 1498c.c.汽油 4X2
2 Prestige SUV 1498c.c.汽油 4X2
  • Applicable
  • Not Applicable

Tested variant

Name of Commercial Vehicle Model S
Date of Purchase 2024-09
Date of Production 2024-09
Maker Taiwan

Adult Occupant

Total 30.936分 / 81%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
6.986 Pts
Frontal Full Width
6.733 Pts
Lateral Impact
16 Pts
Whiplash Rear Impact
1.217 Pts
AEB City
0 Pts
System Name CMBS碰撞緩解煞車系統/FCW前方碰撞警示系統
Type Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 5 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Comments


  1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows: 
    (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
    (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver has "Good" protection in all body parts. The rear seat passengers' chest underwent significant compression due to excessive seat belt tension, resulting in "poor" protection. Other important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
    (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
    (4)Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.

  2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat has "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck. Due to the insufficient effective height of the rear headrest and the large gap between the dummy's head and the headrest, a rear-end collision is likely to cause a whiplash effect on the occupant's neck, therefore, it is rated as "Poor" protection and no points were awarded for rear seat whiplash test.

  3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. However, whiplash performance of front seat does not reach "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system was not awarded the points.

Child Occupant

Total 34.08分 / 69%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children
14.08 Pts
Frontal Impact
6.08 Pts
Lateral Impact
8 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child:Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child:Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size FIT

Safety Features
8 Pts
2nd row outboard 2nd row center 3th row outboard 3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable
CRS Installation Check
12 Pts
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
SEAT POSITION
2ND ROW 3TH ROW
Left Centre Right Left Centre Right
Nuna PRYM(後向) (i-Size)
Nuna PRYM(前向) (i-Size)
Nuna REBL plus (i-Size)
Chicco Auto-Fix Fast手提汽座 (ISOFIX)
Nuna REBL plus (ISOFIX)
Chicco Seat 4 Fix Isofix安全汽座 (ISOFIX)
TOYOTA/LEXUS JUNIOR SEAT2 (ISOFIX)
ABC design GmbH Risus (Seat Belt)
Nuna PIPA lite 提籃+底座 (Seat Belt)
Chicco Eletta寶貝舒適全歲段安全汽座 (Seat Belt)
PERO Luce90 (Seat Belt)
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
    (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the neck and chest of the 6-year-old child dummy was rated as "Marginal" protection, and other important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. However, 10-year-old dummy was not effectively restrained as it moved forward and the seatbelt strap slipped from its shoulder to upper arm, therefore the score was deducted.
    (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.

  2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. 

Pedestrian

Total 33.284 / 79%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Pedestrian
27.518 Pts
HEAD IMPACT
17.707 Pts
PELVIS IMPACT
3.811 Pts
LEG IMPACT
6 Pts
AEB Pedestrian
5.766 Pts
System Name CMBS碰撞緩解煞車系統/FCW前方碰撞警示系統
Type Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From 5 km / h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC. (Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside Crash avoided up to 55 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% Crash avoided up to 55 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles Crash avoided up to 35 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 50 Km/h
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After HONDA HR-V model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's A-pillar and the lower edge of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, therefore it was rated as "Marginal" or "Poor" protection.

  2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
    (1)Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
    (2)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
    (3)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (4)Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 40km/h to 50km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury at 55km/h.

Safety Assist

Total8.241 / 68%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Speed Assistance
0 Pts
Seatbelt Reminder
3 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available

Lane Support
2.7 Pts
System Name LKAS車道維持輔助系統/LDW車道偏移警示系統
Type Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From LKA 72 km/h;LDW 72 km/h
Warning Visual, Audible and Haptic
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Performance
LKA confirmation test Pass(3/5)
LDW confirmation test Pass
AEB Inter-Urban
2.541 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name CMBS碰撞緩解煞車系統/FCW前方碰撞警示系統
Type Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 5 km/h;FCW 5 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Autobrake Function Only Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed 5-100 km/h 5-100 km/h
Approaching a stationary car See AEB city Crash avoided up to 55 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car Crash avoided up to 70 km/h. Crash avoided up to 80 km/h.
Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Mitigation Mitigation
Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently Mitigation Mitigation
Car in front brakes harshly Avoidance Avoidance
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. HONDA HR-V is not equipped with a speed assist system. Therefore, no point was awarded for this function.

  2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.

  3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted.

  4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted. 3 test results are as below:
    (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 60 km/h to 80 km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
    (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50 km/h to 80 km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30 km/h to 70 km/h.
    (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 12m headway with decelerations of 6m/s² and 40m headway with deceleration of 2m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. For AEB test scenario, collision occurred at 12m headway with deceleration of 6m/s² and 40m headway with deceleration of 2m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.