Safety Ratings Information

1. After HYUNDAI TUCSON L model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (2) For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver has "Good" protection in all body parts. However, servere injury exceeding restriction limit on chest of rear passenger, therefore it is rated as "poor" protection and no points are awarded for the dummy.
   (3) For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4) Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", the driver's chest protection is rated as "Marginal", and other important body parts have "Good" protection.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat has "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck. Due to the insufficient effective height of the rear headrest, a rear-end collision is likely to cause a whiplash effect on the occupant's neck, therefore it is rated as "Poor" protection and no points are awarded for rear seat whiplash test.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all AEB City test scenarios. However, as the front seat whiplash protection performance did not achieve a “Good” rating, no points are awarded for the AEB City system.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Joie Bold
Restraint for 10 year old child：PERO IDOL i-size

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After HYUNDAI TUCSON L model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the 6-year-old child dummy's neck protection is rated as "Marginal", and the important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. However, 10-year-old dummy was not effectively restrained as it moved forward and the seatbelt strap slipped from its shoulder, therefore the score is deducted.
   (2) For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. However, as the i-Size marking did not comply with the protocols, no points are awarded for the installation check of i-Size and ISOFIX child restraint systems.

• Not Applicable

1. After HYUNDAI TUCSON L model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's bottom part of A-pillar and the adjacent areas of the headlamp, the head protection performance is rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood is rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of the vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, which is rated as "Weak" or "Poor" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle is rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points.
   


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below. However, as the combined protection scores from the pedestrian head, pelvis, and leg impact tests did not meet the minimum threshold, no points are awarded for the AEB VRU.
   (1) Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (2) Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred between 55km/h to 60km/h, however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (3) Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (4) Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 40km/h to 50km/h, and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injuries between 55km/h to 60km/h. 

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

• Not Applicable

1. HYUNDAI TUCSON L is not equipped with speed assist system, and therefore no point is awarded for this item.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item is deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the score for this item is deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1) Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30km/h to 80km/h.
   (2) Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50km/h to 80km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30km/h to 70km/h.
   (3) Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of AEB tests, collision occurred at 12m headway with decelerations of 6m/s², however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.