Safety Ratings Information

1. After HYUNDAI CUSTIN model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver's right lower leg protection is rated as "Poor" due to the deformation of passenger compartment. Besides, there is a rupture in the driver's footwell and the brake pedal was stuck due to excessive pedal displacement, therefore, the driver's footwell protection is rated as "Weak". The driver's chest protection is rated as "Marginal", other important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. All body parts of passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
   (2) For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (3) For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4) Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", the driver's chest protection is rated as "Marginal", other important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all AEB City test scenarios. However, as the front seat whiplash protection performance did not achieve a “Good” rating, no points are awarded for the AEB City system.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-size
Restraint for 10 year old child：PERO IDOL i-size

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After HYUNDAI CUSTIN model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1) For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the 10-year-old child dummy's neck protection is rated as "Marginal", the important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. However, 10-year-old dummy was not effectively restrained as it moved forward and the seatbelt strap slipped from its shoulder, therefore the score is deducted.
   (2) For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. However, the front passenger airbag warning label did not comply with the protocols; therefore, no points are awarded for this item.

• Not Applicable

1. After HYUNDAI CUSTIN model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's bottom part of A-pillar, the lower edge of the windshield and the adjacent areas of the headlamp, the head protection performance is rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood is rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of the vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, which is rated as "Marginal" or "Poor" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle is rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points.


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
   (1) Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (2) Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred between 50km/h to 60km/h, however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (3) Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
   (4) Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 50km/h to 55km/h, and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries, however, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injuries at 60km/h.

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

• Not Applicable

1. HYUNDAI CUSTIN is not equipped with speed assist system, and therefore no point is awarded for this item.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the score for this item is deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. 3 test results are as below:
   (1) Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collisions occurred at 80km/h. However, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
   (2) Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50km/h to 80km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30km/h to 70km/h.
   (3) Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW and AEB tests, collision occurred at 12m headway with decelerations of 6m/s². However, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.