Safety Ratings Information

1. After TESLA MODEL 3 model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" protection and all body parts get full points.
   (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4)Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat have "Good" protection and rear seat have "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat was rated "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system gets full points.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After TESLA MODEL 3 model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system.

• Not Applicable

1. TESLA MODEL 3 model has deployable hood and conforms to different figures and speed protocols, and headform impact tests of pedestrian protection was conducted in the deployed hood position. As the headform impacted at vehicle's hood, most of the area has rated as "Good" protection. Only vehicle's A-pillar, the lower edge of the windshield and part of the fender, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor". For the pelvis and leg impact test, the front structure of vehicle has rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's pelvis and legs and gets full points.


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and in all 4 tests (Car-to-VRU Farside Adult 50%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult 25%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult 75%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Child 50%), the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.

• Not Applicable

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

• Not Applicable

1. For TESLA MODEL 3 standard-fit speed assistance system, the speed limit information cannot be shown in the whole journey, and it cannot recognize the traffic signs of time, weather, and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit of the road, the system can effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning, but it is not equipped with speed limitation function. Therefore, no point was awarded for this function.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the score for this item was deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the score for this item was deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 60 km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50 km/h to 80 km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30 km/h to 70 km/h.
   (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW  and AEB tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions.