Safety Ratings Information

1. After MG HS model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passenger have "Good" or  "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts. However, the dummy at rear seat was not effectively restrained by the seatbelt during the test, causing the pelvis slipped off the seatbelt, also known as submarining, and therefore the score for this part is deducted and rated as "Poor" protection.
   (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4)Under the more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", the chest protection performance is rated as "Weak" due to the large amount of compression for the ribs when the chest was laterally impacted, other important body parts have "Good" protection.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Good" protection  for the occupant's neck.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with "Good" protection and all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol in City test scenarios. Collision occurred only at 40 km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Römer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child：Britax Römer KIDFIX i-Size

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After MG HS model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
   (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on the child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX, and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate a larger rear-facing child restraint system.

• Not Applicable

1. After MG HS model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's bottom part of A-pillar and the adjacent areas of the headlamp, the head protection performance is rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood is rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle is rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of the vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, which is rated as "Marginal" or "Poor" protection.


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 55km/h to 60km/h, but the  system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred between 45km/h to 55km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury at 60km/h collision.
   (3)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, collisions occurred at 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (4)Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 30km/h and 40km/h to 45km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, collisions occurred at 20km/h and 50km/h to 60km/h but the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury.

• Not Applicable

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

• Not Applicable

1. For MG HS standard-fit speed assistance system, the speed limit information cannot be shown in the whole journey, and it cannot recognize the traffic signs of time, weather, and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit of the road, the system cannot effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning. Therefore, no point is awarded for this item.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alert driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score  for this item is deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol, therefore, the score for this item is deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 55km/h to 65km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury between 70km/h to 80km/h.
   (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50 km/h to 80 km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30 km/h to 70 km/h.
   (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW  and AEB tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions.