Report

Adult Occupant

93%

Child Occupant

77%

Pedestrian

80%

Safety Assist

70%

Specifications

Tested Model NISSAN SENTRA
Body Type 4 Door Saloon
Year Of Publication 2025
Kerb Weight 1294 kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies Reference Rating Validity

Safety Equipment

Driver 1st row
passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Belt Pretensioner
Belt Loadlimiter
Knee Airbag
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Side Chest Airbag
Side Pelvis Airbag
CHILD PROTECTION
ISOFIX
Integrated Child Seat
Airbag cut-off switch
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Blind Spot Monitoring

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Item Model Name Body Type Engine Drivetrain Rating Applies
1 尊爵(受驗車款) 4 Door Saloon 1598c.c.汽油 4X2
2 尊爵智駕 4 Door Saloon 1598c.c.汽油 4X2
3 尊爵BOSE 4 Door Saloon 1598c.c.汽油 4X2
  • Applicable
  • Not Applicable

Tested variant

Name of Commercial Vehicle Model 尊爵版
Date of Purchase 2024-11 ~ 2025-02
Date of Production 2024-06 ~ 2025-02
Maker Taiwan

Adult Occupant

Total 35.456分 / 93%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
6.648 Pts
Frontal Full Width
7.863 Pts
Lateral Impact
15.703 Pts
Whiplash Rear Impact
2.242 Pts
AEB City
3 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name IEB防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 10 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Comments


  1. After NISSAN SENTRA model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
    (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in body parts. However, there is a rupture in the driver's footwell and foot operated parking brake pedal was stuck after the collision, which may cause injury to the feet, so points were deducted.
    (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in body parts.
    (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
    (4)Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", all important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.

  2. After front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat have "Good" protection and rear seat have "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck.

  3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat was rated "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system gets full points.

Child Occupant

Total 37.804分 / 77%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children
15.804 Pts
Frontal Impact
7.804 Pts
Lateral Impact
8 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child:Combi New Prim Long
Restraint for 10 year old child:GRACO TURBOBOOSTER LX

Safety Features
10 Pts
2nd row outboard 2nd row center 3th row outboard 3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable
CRS Installation Check
12 Pts
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
SEAT POSITION
2ND ROW 3TH ROW
Left Centre Right Left Centre Right
Nuna PRYM(後向) (i-Size)
Nuna PRYM(前向) (i-Size)
Nuna REBL plus (i-Size)
Chicco Auto-Fix Fast手提汽座 (ISOFIX)
Nuna REBL plus (ISOFIX)
Chicco Seat 4 Fix Isofix安全汽座 (ISOFIX)
TOYOTA/LEXUS JUNIOR SEAT2 (ISOFIX)
ABC design GmbH Risus (Seat Belt)
Nuna PIPA lite 提籃+底座 (Seat Belt)
Chicco Eletta寶貝舒適全歲段安全汽座 (Seat Belt)
PERO Luce90 (Seat Belt)
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After NISSAN SENTRA model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
    (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the neck and chest of the 6-year-old child dummy was rated as "Marginal" protection, however, the head sustained severe injuries exceeding restriction limits, so no points were awarded for the dummy. The 10-year-old child dummy had "Good" or "Adequate" protection for important body parts.
    (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.

  2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system. The front passenger seat is equipped with an automatic airbag deactivation switch, the system can effectively provide the airbag status through visualization for the driver and the front passenger.

Pedestrian

Total 33.824 / 80%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Pedestrian
27.963 Pts
HEAD IMPACT
15.963 Pts
PELVIS IMPACT
6 Pts
LEG IMPACT
6 Pts
AEB Pedestrian
5.861 Pts
System Name P-IEB行人防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From 10 km / h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside Crash avoided up to 40 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles Crash avoided up to 40 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 50 Km/h
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After NISSAN SENTRA model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection tests, as the headform impacts at vehicle's A-pillar and its adjacent areas of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood areas were rated as "Adequate" protection. For the pelvis and leg impact test, the front structure of vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's pelvis and legs and gets full points.

  2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
    (1)Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 45km/h to 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
    (2)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (3)Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (4)Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 45km/h to 50km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury at 55km/h.

Safety Assist

Total8.427 / 70%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Speed Assistance
0 Pts
Seatbelt Reminder
3 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available

Lane Support
2.7 Pts
System Name LDP車道偏離預防系統/LDW車道偏離警示系統
Type Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From LKA 60 km/h;LDW 60 km/h
Warning Visual and Haptic
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Performance
LKA confirmation test Pass(4/5)
LDW confirmation test Pass
AEB Inter-Urban
2.727 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name IEB防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 10 km/h;FCW 10 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions:Pass)
Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Autobrake Function Only Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed 10-200 km/h 10-200 km/h
Approaching a stationary car See AEB city Crash avoided up to 70 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car Crash avoided up to 70 km/h. Crash avoided up to 70 km/h.
Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Mitigation Mitigation
Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Avoidance Avoidance
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. NISSAN SENTRA is not equipped with speed assist system, and therefore no points were awarded for this item.

  2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alert driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.

  3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted.

  4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. 3 test results are as below:
    (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collisions occurred between 75km/h to 80km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
    (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 75km/h to 80km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well in avoiding collisions at speeds between 30 km/h and 70 km/h.
    (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW and AEB tests, collision both occurred at 12m headway with deceleration of 6m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.