Adult Occupant
Child Occupant
Pedestrian
Safety Assist
Tested Model | FORD FOCUS |
---|---|
Body Type | 5 Door Hatchback |
Year Of Publication | 2023 |
Kerb Weight | 1310 kg |
VIN From Which Rating Applies | Reference Rating Validity |
Driver | 1st row passenger |
2nd row outboard |
2nd row center |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION | ||||
Front Airbag | ||||
Belt Pretensioner | ||||
Belt Loadlimiter | ||||
Knee Airbag | ||||
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION | ||||
Side Head Airbag | ||||
Side Chest Airbag | ||||
Side Pelvis Airbag | ||||
CHILD PROTECTION | ||||
ISOFIX | ||||
Integrated Child Seat | ||||
Airbag cut-off switch | ||||
SAFETY ASSIST | ||||
Seatbelt Reminder | ||||
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS | ||||
Active Bonnet | ||||
AEB Pedestrian | ||||
AEB City | ||||
AEB Interurban | ||||
Speed Assistance | ||||
Lane Assist System | ||||
Blind Spot Monitoring | ||||
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
|
Variants of Model Range
Item | Model Name | Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | X Hatchback(受驗車款) | 5 Door Hatchback | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
2 | ST-Line X Hatchback | 5 Door Hatchback | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
3 | ST-Line Vignale Hatchback | 5 Door Hatchback | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
4 | Active X | 5 Door Hatchback | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
5 | Active Vignale | 5 Door Hatchback | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
6 | X Wagon | 5 Door Estate | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
7 | ST-Line X Wagon | 5 Door Estate | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 | |
8 | ST-Line Vignale Wagon | 5 Door Estate | 1497c.c.汽油 | 4X2 |
Tested variant
Name of Commercial Vehicle Model | X Hatchback |
---|---|
Date of Purchase | 2023-03 ~ 2023-08 |
Date of Production | 2023-02 ~ 2023-06 |
Maker | Taiwan |
System Name | AEB全速域輔助煞停系統 |
---|---|
Type | Auto-Brake |
Operational From | AEB 5 km/h |
Additional Information | Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass) |
After the FORD FOCUS model were conducted the four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
1.For “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests”, the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in body parts. However, there is a rupture in the driver's footwell after the collision, which may cause serious injury to the feet, so points were deducted.
2.For “Full Width Frontal Impact Tests”, the important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in body parts.
3.For “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
4.Under the more severe test conditions of the “Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests”, the important parts of the body have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat has "Good" protection for the occupant's neck, and the rear seat has "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck.
This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat was rated "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system gets full points.
Restraint for 6 year old child:Britax Römer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child:Britax Römer KIDFIX i-Size
2nd row outboard | 2nd row center | 3th row outboard | 3th row center | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ISOFIX | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated Child Protect | ||||
Bag Release |
SEAT POSITION | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2ND ROW | 3TH ROW | |||||
Left | Centre | Right | Left | Centre | Right | |
Nuna PRYM(後向) (i-Size) | ||||||
Nuna PRYM(前向) (i-Size) | ||||||
Nuna REBL plus (i-Size) | ||||||
Chicco Auto-Fix Fast手提汽座 (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Nuna REBL plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Chicco Seat 4 Fix Isofix安全汽座 (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Joyson Safety Systems Japan K.K. JUNIOR SEAT 2 (ISOFIX) | ||||||
ABC design GmbH Risus (Seat Belt) | ||||||
Nuna PIPA lite 提籃+底座 (Seat Belt) | ||||||
Chicco Eletta寶貝舒適全歲段安全汽座 (Seat Belt) | ||||||
PERO Luce90 (Seat Belt) |
After the FORD FOCUS model were conducted “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests”, for 6-year-old and 10-year-old children of crash performance, the important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. After “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, the important body parts of the child dummy in the car was rated as "Good" protection and gets full points.
The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system.
System Name | AEB全速域輔助煞停系統 |
---|---|
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning |
Operational From | 5 km / h |
Additional Information | Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC. (Scoring Conditions: Pass) Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass) |
Avoidance | Mitigation | |
---|---|---|
Running Adult crossing from Farside | Crash avoided up to 50 Km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h |
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% | Crash avoided up to 45 Km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h |
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% | Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h | |
Running Child from behind parked vehicles | Crash avoided up to 40 Km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 Km/h |
After the FORD FOCUS model were conducted Headform Impact Tests of pedestrian protection tests, which impacts at vehicle's A-pillar and its adjacent areas of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. After the pelvis impact test and leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's pelvis and legs and gets full points.
This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
1.Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 55km/h to 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
2.Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, collisions occurred at 50km/h to 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
3.Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions at 20km/h to 60km/h.
4.Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 45km/h to 60km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
System Name | i-ACC智慧型定速巡航調節系統 |
---|---|
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera & Map,subsigns supported |
Warning Function | System advised |
Speed Limitation Function | System advised(accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | All seats | ||
---|---|---|---|
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible |
System Name | LCA車道導正輔助系統;LKA車道偏移輔助系統;LDW車道偏移警示系統 |
---|---|
Type | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
Operational From | LKA 65 km/h;LDW 65 km/h |
Warning | Audible and Haptic |
Additional Information | Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Pass) |
Performance | |
---|---|
LKA confirmation test | Pass(5/5) |
LDW confirmation test | Pass |
System Name | AEB全速域輔助煞停系統 |
---|---|
Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake |
Operational From | AEB 5 km/h;FCW 5 km/h |
Additional Information | Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail) |
Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |
---|---|---|
Operational speed | 5-130 km/h | 5-130 km/h |
Approaching a stationary car | See AEB city | Crash avoided up to 50 km/h. |
Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 65 km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80 km/h. |
Following a car at short distance | ||
---|---|---|
Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Avoidance |
Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance |
Following a car at long distance | ||
---|---|---|
Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance |
Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance |
FORD FOCUS has a standard-fit speed assistance system, the speed limit information can be shown all the time, but it cannot recognize the traffic signs for time, weather, and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit of the road, the system can effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning, and can stably maintain the actual vehicle speed within 5km/h of the traffic speed limit.
Both the front and rear seats are equipped with standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can detect occupant of front passenger seat, which effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.
When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol.
The vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. 3 test results are as below:
1.Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 55km/h to 80km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
2.Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of AEB tests, collision occurred at 70km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
3.Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of AEB tests, collision occurred at 12m headway, 2m/s2 deceleration, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.