Report

Performance: GOOD

System Name	避撞輔助
Type	Auto-Brake
Operational From	AEB 5 km/h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

1. After TESLA MODEL Y model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in all body parts.
   (2)For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver and passengers have "Good" protection and all body parts get full points.
   (3)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (4)Under the more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.


2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Good" protection for the occupant's neck.


3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat was rated "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system gets full points.
   
   

Restraint for 6 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child：Britax Romer KIDFIX i-Size

	2nd row outboard	2nd row center	3th row outboard	3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

1. After TESLA MODEL Y model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
   (1)For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
   (2)For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points


2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system.

System Name	避撞輔助
Type	Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From	5 km / h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC. (Scoring Conditions: Pass) Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

	Avoidance	Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h

• Not Applicable

1. After TESLA MODEL Y model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's A-pillar and the lower edge of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. For the leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs and gets full points. For the pelvis impact test, the front structure of vehicle has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection on the pedestrian's femur and pelvis.


2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results (Car-to-VRU Farside Adult 50%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult 25%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult 75%, Car-to-VRU Nearside Child 50%), the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.

System Name	車速輔助
Speed Limit Information Function	Map based
Warning Function	Active braking (no warning necessary)
Speed Limitation Function

• Not Applicable

Applies To	All seats
Warning	Driver Seat	Front Passenger(s)	Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

System Name	車道偏離輔助
Type	Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From	LKA 64 km/h;LDW 64 km/h
Warning	Visual and Haptic
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

Performance
LKA confirmation test	Pass(5/5)
LDW confirmation test	Pass

Performance: GOOD

System Name	避撞輔助
Type	Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From	AEB 5 km/h;FCW 5 km/h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail)

	Autobrake Function Only	Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed	5-200 km/h	5-200 km/h
Approaching a stationary car	See AEB city	Crash avoided up to 65 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car	Crash avoided up to 70 km/h.	Crash avoided up to 80 km/h.

Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance	Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly	Mitigation	Avoidance

Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance	Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly	Avoidance	Avoidance

• Not Applicable

1. TESLA MODEL Y has a standard-fit speed assistance system, the speed limit information cannot be shown in the whole journey, and it cannot recognize the traffic signs of time, weather, and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the speed limit of the road, the system can effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning, but it is not equipped with speed limitation function. Therefore, no point was awarded for this function.


2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alert driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.


3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted.


4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. Therefore, the score for this item was deducted. 3 test results are as below:
   (1)Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 70 km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.
   (2)Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50 km/h to 80 km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30 km/h to 70 km/h.
   (3)Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW   tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions at 12 m and 40m headway with deceleration of 2 m/s² and 6 m/s². For AEB test scenario, collision occurred at 12 m headway with deceleration of 6 m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.