Report

System Name	PCS預警式防護系統
Type	Auto-Brake
Operational From	AEB 10 km/h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

After the RAV4 model were carried out the four TNCAP impact tests, the results as follows: For “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests” and “Full Width Frontal Impact Tests”, according to the results of the dummy measurement, the driver and passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection in different parts of the body. In the “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full marks; under the more severe test conditions of side pole test, important body parts have "Good" or " Adequate " protection.
In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat has "Poor" protection for the occupant's neck, and the rear seat geometry rating has "Good" protection for the seat and head restraint.
RAV4 has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which has performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. However, the protection performance of front seat does not reach "Good" protection, Thus the AEB City system was not awarded points according to the protocol.

Restraint for 6 year old child：Joyson Safety Systems Japan K.K. JUNIOR SEAT 2
Restraint for 10 year old child：Joyson Safety Systems Japan K.K. JUNIOR SEAT 2

	2nd row outboard	2nd row center	3th row outboard	3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release

• Fitted to the vehicle as standard
• Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
• Not Available
• Not Applicable

• Install without problem
• Install with care
• Safety critical problem
• Installation not allowed
• Not Applicable

After the RAV4 model were carried out “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests” and “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, the important body parts of the child dummy in the vehicle were rated as "Good" protection and get full marks.
The car owner’s manual clearly records the information on child restraint system, which is applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size) after being rated. However, since the vehicle model does not recommend suitable child restraint system recommended for different age groups, so no marks was given for the recommended child restraint system installation item. In addition, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system at the left and right seat positions of the second row, and can accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system.

System Name	PCS預警式防護系統
Type	Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From	10 km / h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC. (Scoring Conditions: Pass) Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

	Avoidance	Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%	Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles	Crash avoided up to 45 Km/h

• Not Applicable

After the RAV4 model were carried out “Headform Impact Tests”, the intersection of the front edge of the hood and the headlight, the A-pillar and the bottom of the adjacent windshield were relatively hard, and the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or "Poor". The rest of the hood were rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. In addition, the front bumper of the vehicle has "Good" protection on the pelvis and legs of pedestrian.
RAV4 has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which has performed well with collisions avoided in all adult test scenarios, and the system can effectively avoid or mitigate the severity of collisions in child test scenarios, except it cannot effectively mitigate the severity of collisions for speed range between 50km/h to 60km/h in child test scenarios.

Applies To	All seats
Warning	Driver Seat	Front Passenger(s)	Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

• Pass
• Fail
• Not available

System Name	LTA車道循跡輔助系統
Type	Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From	LKA 50 km/h;LDW 50 km/h
Warning	Audible and Visual
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Pass)

Performance
LKA confirmation test	Pass(5/5)
LDW confirmation test	Pass

Performance: GOOD

System Name	PCS預警式防護系統
Type	Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From	AEB 10 km/h;FCW 10 km/h
Additional Information	Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass) Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass) Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass) Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Fail) Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail)

	Autobrake Function Only	Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed	10-180 km/h	10-180 km/h
Approaching a stationary car	See AEB City	Crash avoided up to 75 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car	Crash avoided up to 70 km/h.	Crash avoided up to 80 km/h.

Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance	Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly	Avoidance	Avoidance

Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance	Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly	Avoidance	Avoidance

• Not Applicable

RAV4 is not equipped with a speed assist system, and therefore this item was not scored.
Both the front and rear seats are equipped with standard-fit seatbelt reminder, which effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full marks.
When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support systems can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol.
The vehicle is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. For AEB test which has performed well with collisions avoided in all high-speed performance tests and rated as “Good” protection, for FCW test which collision occurred only at the test speed of 80km/h of Car-to-Car Rear Stationary(CCRs). However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol.