Report

Adult Occupant

81%

Child Occupant

84%

Pedestrian

81%

Safety Assist

59%

Specifications

Tested Model NISSAN KICKS
Body Type 5 Door Hatchback
Year Of Publication 2023
Kerb Weight 1194 kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies Reference Rating Validity

Safety Equipment

Driver 1st row
passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Belt Pretensioner
Belt Loadlimiter
Knee Airbag
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Side Chest Airbag
Side Pelvis Airbag
CHILD PROTECTION
ISOFIX
Integrated Child Seat
Airbag cut-off switch
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Blind Spot Monitoring

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Item Model Name Body Type Engine Drivetrain Rating Applies
1 卓越版(受驗車款) 5 Door Hatchback 1598c.c.汽油 4X2
2 旗艦版 5 Door Hatchback 1598c.c.汽油 4X2
  • Applicable
  • Not Applicable

Tested variant

Name of Commercial Vehicle Model 卓越版
Date of Purchase 2023-05
Date of Production 2023-03 ~ 2023-05
Maker Taiwan

Adult Occupant

Total 31.089分 / 81%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
7.211 Pts
Frontal Full Width
6.889 Pts
Lateral Impact
14.882 Pts
Whiplash Rear Impact
2.107 Pts
AEB City
0 Pts
System Name IEB防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 10 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Comments

After NISSAN KICKS model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
1.For “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests”, the driver and passenger have "Good " or "Adequate" protection in body parts.
2.For “Full Width Frontal Impact Tests”, the driver has "Good" protection in body parts. However, the dummy at rear seat was not effectively restrained during the test, causing the pelvis slipped under the lap section of the seatbelt, also known as submarining, and therefore the score for this parts were deducted and rated as “poor” protection.
3.For “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
4.Under the more severe test conditions of the “Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests”, the chest was rated as "Marginal" protection. Other important body parts have "Good" protection.
In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Marginal" protection for the occupant's neck.
This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash performance of front seat does not reach "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system was not awarded points.


 

Child Occupant

Total 41.445分 / 84%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children
22.445 Pts
Frontal Impact
14.445 Pts
Lateral Impact
8 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child:Britax Römer KIDFIX i-SIZE
Restraint for 10 year old child:GRACO Junior Maxi

Safety Features
7 Pts
2nd row outboard 2nd row center 3th row outboard 3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable
CRS Installation Check
12 Pts
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
SEAT POSITION
2ND ROW 3TH ROW
Left Centre Right Left Centre Right
Nuna PRYM(後向) (i-Size)
Nuna PRYM(前向) (i-Size)
Nuna REBL plus (i-Size)
Chicco Auto-Fix Fast手提汽座 (ISOFIX)
Nuna REBL plus (ISOFIX)
Chicco Seat 4 Fix Isofix安全汽座 (ISOFIX)
TOYOTA/LEXUS JUNIOR SEAT2 (ISOFIX)
ABC design GmbH Risus (Seat Belt)
Nuna PIPA lite 提籃+底座 (Seat Belt)
Chicco Eletta寶貝舒適全歲段安全汽座 (Seat Belt)
PERO Luce90 (Seat Belt)
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Not Applicable
Comments

After NISSAN KICKS model were conducted “Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests”, the neck of the 10-year-old child dummy was rated as "Marginal" protection, and other important body parts of the child dummy in the car have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. After “Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests”, all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
The car owner’s manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. The rear seat can be correctly installed with all types of child restraint system (universal, ISOFIX and i-Size). Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate larger rear-facing child restraint system.

Pedestrian

Total 34.207 / 81%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Pedestrian
28.664 Pts
HEAD IMPACT
16.939 Pts
PELVIS IMPACT
5.725 Pts
LEG IMPACT
6 Pts
AEB Pedestrian
5.543 Pts
System Name P-IEB行人防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From 10 km / h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC. (Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside Crash avoided up to 45 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 50 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles Crash avoided up to 35 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 45 Km/h
  • Not Applicable
Comments

After NISSAN KICKS model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection tests, as the headform impacts at vehicle's A-pillar and its adjacent areas of the windshield, the head protection performance was rated as "Weak" or " Poor ", and the rest of the hood has rated as "Good" or "Adequate" protection. After the pelvis impact test and leg impact test, the front bumper of the vehicle was rated as "Good" protection on the pedestrian's legs. However since part of front structure of vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, therefore it was rated as "Marginal" protection.
This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
1.Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, collisions occurred at 50km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury between 55km/h to 60km/h.
2.Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
3.Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
4.Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 40km/h to 45km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury between 50km/h to 60km/h.

Safety Assist

Total7.146 / 59%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Speed Assistance
0 Pts
Seatbelt Reminder
3 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available

Lane Support
1.7 Pts
System Name LDW車道偏離警示系統
Type Lane Departure Warning
Operational From LDW 70 km/h
Warning Visual and Haptic
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Performance
LKA confirmation test Fail
LDW confirmation test Pass
AEB Inter-Urban
2.446 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name IEB防追撞緊急煞車系統
Type Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 10 km/h;FCW 10 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions:Fail)
Autobrake Function Only Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed 10-80 km/h 10-80 km/h
Approaching a stationary car See AEB city Crash avoided up to 55 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car Crash avoided up to 70 km/h. Crash avoided up to 70 km/h.
Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently Mitigation Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Mitigation Mitigation
Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Mitigation Mitigation
  • Not Applicable
Comments

NISSAN KICKS is not equipped with a speed assist system, and therefore no points were awarded for this item.
Both the front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can detect occupant of front passenger seat, which effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.
Lane support system only has lane departure warning function and it doesn’t have lane keeping assist function. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane departure warning system can alert the driver to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol.
This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. 3 test results are as below:
1.Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 60km/h to 70km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injury between 75km/h to 80km/h.
2.Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, collision occurred between 75km/h to 80km/h, but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. For AEB test scenario, the system performed well to avoid all collisions.
3.Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW tests, collision occurred at 12m and 40m headway with decelerations of 6m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury. For AEB test scenario, collision occurred at 12m headway with deceleration of 2 m/s², 6m/s² and at 40m headway with deceleration of 6m/s², but the system can mitigate the degree of injury.