Report

Adult Occupant

90%

Child Occupant

87%

Pedestrian

68%

Safety Assist

86%

Specifications

Tested Model LUXGEN n7
Body Type SUV
Year Of Publication 2025
Kerb Weight 2100 kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies Reference Rating Validity

Safety Equipment

Driver 1st row
passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Belt Pretensioner
Belt Loadlimiter
Knee Airbag
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Side Chest Airbag
Side Pelvis Airbag
CHILD PROTECTION
ISOFIX
Integrated Child Seat
Airbag cut-off switch
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Blind Spot Monitoring

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Item Model Name Body Type Engine Drivetrain Rating Applies
1 5人亮點版 SUV 電能 4X2
2 7人亮點版 SUV 電能 4X2
3 LR 5人粹鍊版 SUV 電能 4X2
4 LR 5人粹鍊+版(受驗車款) SUV 電能 4X2
5 LR 5人亮點版 SUV 電能 4X2
6 LR 7人亮點版 SUV 電能 4X2
  • Applicable
  • Not Applicable

Tested variant

Name of Commercial Vehicle Model LR 5人粹鍊+版
Date of Purchase 2025-06
Date of Production 2025-06
Maker Taiwan

Adult Occupant

Total 34.402分 / 90%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
5.431 Pts
Frontal Full Width
7.466 Pts
Lateral Impact
16 Pts
Whiplash Rear Impact
2.505 Pts
AEB City
3 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name AEB自動緊急煞車
Type Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 5 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Comments


  1. After LUXGEN n7 model were conducted four TNCAP impact tests, the results are as follows:
    (1) 
    For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", the brake pedal was stuck due to excessive pedal displacement, therefore, the driver's footwell protection is rated as "Weak". The driver's chest protection is rated as "Marginal", and other important body parts have "Good" or "Adequate" protection. All body parts of the front passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
    (2) 
    For "Full Width Frontal Impact Tests", the driver's chest protection is rated as "Marginal", and other important body parts have "Good" protection. All body parts of the rear passenger have "Good" or "Adequate" protection.
    (3) 
    For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", all important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
    (4) 
    Under more severe test conditions of the "Oblique Pole Side Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.

  2. In the front seat and rear seat whiplash tests, the front seat and rear seat have "Good" protection for the occupant's neck.

  3. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which performed well with collisions avoided in all AEB City test scenarios. Furthermore, whiplash protection performance of front seat is rated as "Good" protection. Therefore, the AEB City system gets full points.

Child Occupant

Total 42.667分 / 87%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children
24 Pts
Frontal Impact
16 Pts
Lateral Impact
8 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child:Britax Romer KidFix i-Size
Restraint for 10 year old child:TOYOTA JUNIOR SEAT2

Safety Features
8 Pts
2nd row outboard 2nd row center 3th row outboard 3th row center
ISOFIX
i-Size
Integrated Child Protect
Bag Release
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable
CRS Installation Check
10.667 Pts
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
SEAT POSITION
2ND ROW 3TH ROW
Left Centre Right Left Centre Right
Nuna PRYM(後向) (i-Size)
Nuna PRYM(前向) (i-Size)
Nuna REBL plus (i-Size)
Chicco Auto-Fix Fast手提汽座 (ISOFIX)
Nuna REBL plus (ISOFIX)
Chicco Seat 4 Fix Isofix安全汽座 (ISOFIX)
TOYOTA/LEXUS JUNIOR SEAT2 (ISOFIX)
ABC design GmbH Risus (Seat Belt)
Nuna PIPA lite 提籃+底座 (Seat Belt)
Chicco Eletta寶貝舒適全歲段安全汽座 (Seat Belt)
PERO Luce90 (Seat Belt)
  • Install without problem
  • Install with care
  • Safety critical problem
  • Installation not allowed
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After LUXGEN n7 model were conducted impact tests for the 6-year-old and 10-year-old child dummies, the results are as follows:
    (1) 
    For "Offset Deformable Barrier Frontal Impact Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.
    (2) 
    For "Side Impact Mobile Deformable Barrier Tests", important body parts have "Good" protection and get full points.

  2. The car owner's manual clearly records the information on child restraint system applicable to the rear seat. Only the outer seats can be correctly installed with ISOFIX and i-Size types of child restraint system after being tested. Vehicle manufacturer recommends suitable child restraint system information for different age groups. Besides, the vehicle is equipped with the function of installing i-Size child restraint system on the left and right seats of the second row with i-Size labels, it could also accommodate a larger rear-facing child restraint system.

Pedestrian

Total 28.752 / 68%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Pedestrian
22.891 Pts
HEAD IMPACT
13.824 Pts
PELVIS IMPACT
3.6 Pts
LEG IMPACT
5.467 Pts
AEB Pedestrian
5.861 Pts
System Name AEB自動緊急煞車
Type Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From 5 km / h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning needs loud and clear and to be issued at least 1.2 seconds TTC(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Operates in low ambient light(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75% Crash avoided up to 60 Km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles Crash avoided up to 40 Km/h Impact mitigated up to 50 Km/h
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. After LUXGEN n7 model were conducted headform impact tests of pedestrian protection, as the headform impacted at vehicle's bottom part of A-pillar and the adjacent areas of the headlamp, the head protection performance is rated as "Weak" or "Poor", and the rest of the hood is rated as  "Adequate" protection. For the pelvis impact test, part of front structure of the vehicle caused larger impact force on the femur and pelvis of pedestrian, which is rated as "Poor" protection. For the leg impact test, certain areas of the vehicle's front bumper caused significant bending injury to the leg of pedestrian, which is rated as "Marginal" protection.

  2. This vehicle model has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In vulnerable road user test scenarios, all the functions of human machine interface meet the protocol and 4 test results are as below:
    (1) 
    Car-to-VRU Farside Adult (50%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (2) 
    Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (25%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (3) 
    Car-to-VRU Nearside Adult (75%) tests, the system performed well to avoid all collisions between 20km/h to 60km/h.
    (4) 
    Car-to-VRU Nearside Child (50%) tests, collisions occurred between 45km/h to 50km/h, and the system can mitigate the degree of injuries. However, the system cannot effectively mitigate the degree of injuries between 55km/h to 60km/h.

Safety Assist

Total10.326 / 86%
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARGINAL
WEAK
POOR
Speed Assistance
1.75 Pts
System Name 車速限速預警
Speed Limit Information Function Camera based
Warning Function Manually set
Speed Limitation Function Manually set(accurate to 5km/h)
  • Not Applicable
Seatbelt Reminder
3 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible

  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available

Lane Support
2.8 Pts
System Name LKA車道保持輔助系統
Type Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From LKA 60 km/h;LDW 60 km/h
Warning Audible and Visual
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Haptic warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Blind spot monitoring(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Performance
LKA confirmation test Pass(5/5)
LDW confirmation test Pass
AEB Inter-Urban
2.776 Pts
Performance: GOOD
System Name AEB自動緊急煞車
Type Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From AEB 5 km/h;FCW 5 km/h
Additional Information Default on for every journey(Preconditions: Pass)
Audiovisual warning(Preconditions: Pass)
Minimum requirements to turn off AEB/FCW(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Supplementary warning(Scoring Conditions: Pass)
Seatbelt activation(Scoring Conditions: Fail)
Autobrake Function Only Driver reacts to warning
Operational speed 5-200 km/h 5-200 km/h
Approaching a stationary car See AEB city Crash avoided up to 65 km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car Crash avoided up to 70 km/h. Crash avoided up to 80 km/h.
Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Avoidance Avoidance
Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently Mitigation Mitigation
Car in front brakes harshly Avoidance Avoidance
  • Not Applicable
Comments


  1. LUXGEN n7 has a standard-fit speed assistance system, the speed limit information can be shown all the time, but it cannot recognize the traffic signs for time, weather, and vehicle category. When the vehicle speed exceeds the manual speed limit, the system can effectively warn the driver by audiovisual warning, and can stably maintain the actual vehicle speed within 5km/h of the manual speed limit.

  2. Both front and rear seats are equipped with a standard-fit seatbelt reminder, the system can effectively alerts driver through audiovisual warnings. Therefore, the system gets full points.

  3. When the vehicle drifts from the driving lane, the lane support system can alert and automatically intervene to correct the driving direction to the original driving path. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocols. Therefore, the score for this item is deducted.

  4. This vehicle model is equipped with a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system, which is rated as "Good" protection in high-speed performance tests. However, part of the functions of human machine interface do not meet the protocol. 3 test results are as below:
    (1)
    Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) of FCW tests, collisions occurred between 70km/h to 80km/h, however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.
    (2) 
    Car-to-Car Rear Moving (CCRm) of FCW tests, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 50km/h to 80km/h. For AEB test scenario, the vehicle performed well to avoid all collisions between 30km/h to 70km/h.
    (3) 
    Car-to-Car Rear Braking (CCRb) of FCW and AEB tests, collision occurred at 40m headway with decelerations of 2m/s², however, the system can mitigate the degree of injuries.